1. From January 16, 2014 to January 16, 2015, the Korean Federation of Passenger Transport Business Act (hereinafter “Korea Federation”) provides that KRW 2,927,438 shall apply to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner and driver of the Plaintiff’s private taxi (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s Federation of the Korea Passenger Transport Business Association (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) is the Plaintiff’s Financial Cooperative of the Jeonbuk 30 U.S. 2324 (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) and the Defendant National Federation of Passenger Passenger Transport Business Association (hereinafter “Defendant 2”) is the Plaintiff’s Financial Cooperative.

B. (1) On January 16, 2014, as a driver of Defendant 1 who is Defendant 1, who is a non-party limited liability company, the non-party C driven Defendant 1 on the duty of 17:05, and resisted Defendant 1 to the left at the math intersection located in the front city of the front city (hereinafter “instant intersection”). The non-party C was a driver of Defendant 1’s vehicle in front of the Plaintiff’s driver’s seat in the front of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle entered the intersection of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city of the front city and the Plaintiff’s vehicle of the front city was an accident.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 3 to 5 evidence, 7 evidence, 14 evidence, Eul 2 evidence, Eul 1 evidence, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. As to the plaintiff's claim against the defendant 1

A. According to the facts of recognition of the liability for damages, the driver of Defendant 1’s vehicle is negligent in violating the duty of safe driving, and as such, Defendant 1, the mutual aid business operator of Defendant 1’s vehicle, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident (the Plaintiff asserted that Defendant 1’s driver was negligent in violating the signal, but according to Article 6(2) and [Attachment Table 2] of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act, the intersection in which the non-protection coordinates is allowed is straight to green signals.