Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is Furged and engaged in driving of automobiles.

On December 7, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol of 0.061% on blood alcohol level 04:45 on December 7, 2014, and proceeded at a speed of about 60 km from the side of the side of the side of the H in Daejeon-gu, along with one lane prior to the third-lane of the H in Daejeon-gu.

A person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to view the front door and operate the operation and steering system accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim I (29 years of age) who crosses the road from the right side to the left side by his negligence and did not have the victim I (29 years of age) and shocked the defendant on the front side of the defendant's vehicle to go beyond the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to brain damage, etc. around 05:06 on the same day by occupational negligence.

B. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) was driven by the Defendant under the influence of alcohol 0.061% in a section of about 10km from the roads near Seo-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, under paragraph (1) to the roads in front of the above H, while under the influence of alcohol 0.061%.

C. At the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) of Article 1, the Defendant: (a) sent a telephone to a pro-Japanese friendly A who caused a traffic accident at around 04:50 on the same day with the intent to escape from criminal liability; and (b) caused the said A to make the said A to make a false statement to the circumstances leading up to the traffic investigation department of the Daejeon District Police Station in the Daejeon District, which arrived at the said site at around 05:10 on the same day by demanding that “the driver of the vehicle in question is a driver of the vehicle in question.”

2. Defendant B. The Defendant