A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Changwon District Court on September 21, 2012 and completed the execution of the above punishment on February 9, 2013

1. On September 27, 2015, the Defendant was not a person handling narcotics. On September 27, 2015, around 14:40 on September 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sold to E a psychotropic drug in cash one injection of a psychotropic drug, including approximately 0.03g of a psychotropic drug, for a single psychotropic drug, in front of the Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, C. D.

2. From September 30, 2016 to October 4, 2016, the Defendant was not a narcotics handler; however, from September 30, 2016 to October 4, 2016, the Defendant administered the quantity of psychotropic drugs in a non-pharmaceutical form, which is psychotropic drugs, in a non-pharmaceutical manner, at Changwon Mucompo-gu C, D Daywon, and Changwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each investigation report (related to response to the E monetary details, and specific relation to the date, time, and place of crime);

1. A written reply to each request for appraisal and a narcotics appraisal report attached thereto;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, the current status of personal confinement, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, investigation reports (criminal records of the same kind and attachment of

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and Article 2 subparagraph 3 (b) (the point of trade of phiphonephones) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) (the point of trade of phiphonephones) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes (limited to the crimes of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. due to Purchase and Sale of Handphones);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. is that the defendant has been punished several times for a crime related to narcotics, and the crime of this case is that the defendant has traded and administered psychotropic drugs, psychotropic drugs.