logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2014.06.30 2012가단20501
소유권이전등기절차이행
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Of the real estate listed in Appendix 1 List No. 1, the Attached Form No. 12, 134, 15, 16, 17, 3, 18, 19, 20;

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The registration procedure for the transfer of F’s ownership was completed with respect to the area of 3,300 square meters and 3,174 square meters in Sinsan-si (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”). However, as the F died on May 19, 200, Defendant B, his wife, inherited his share of 3/5, and 2/5 shares by Defendant C, his wife, who is his wife, inherited his share of 3/5.

(hereinafter referred to as “F”). (b)

From 1982 to 1982 with the husband G, the Plaintiff occupied each part of the instant land by using the housing and livestock shed on each of the instant land.

C. On February 1997, when the Plaintiff and G were believed to have promised to donate the deceased’s housing and the surrounding land of the stable around 1986, the deceased was able to sell each of the instant land, etc. on or around February 1997, and the Plaintiff and G present a document stating the requirements of the Plaintiff and G (hereinafter “the instant document”) with the following contents. According to the results of the appraiser I’s appraisal of the Plaintiff’s signature completion of the instant document, according to the Plaintiff’s signature completion of the document, the writing of the deceased’s signature completion of the document of this case has different characteristics. However, according to the evidence No. 10 (Appraisal)’s statement, the signature completion of the deceased’s written document of this case has similar characteristics to the writing of the deceased’s signature written statement of this case, and it is difficult to conclude that the part of the deceased’s signature on behalf of the appraiser was insufficient to be compared with the written appraisal result of the appraiser’s signature completion of the document of this case.

In addition, in this court, the witness G testified that the deceased directly signed the written document of this case, and the witness H testified that the deceased directly confirmed the written document of this case. Therefore, the deceased testified that the written document of this case.

arrow