logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2019.06.04 2019고정32
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2018, the Defendants were subject to punishment for E (55 years old) and G (25 years old), H (29 years old and 29 years old) and Si expenses, on the ground that the Defendants’ daily behavior, among E (F Kaf) faf operated by E (D) in Jung-gu, Jung (5 years old and 25 years old and 29 years old and 29 years old and faf.

1. The Defendant: (a) made a defect in the phrase “fortunately,” and laid down coffees on the floor; and (b) when the victim G resists the Defendant, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s cocon part at one time.

2. Defendant C

A. While the Defendant, as seen above, was trying to go out of the victim E, was injured by the victim’s body with the victim’s hand so that the victim could not get out of the carpet, and was spawned, thereby causing approximately 14 days of treatment to the victim, such as spawn, tension, etc.

B. As seen above, the Defendant: (a) dumped a ebbbbbial, and flaped the victim G with a defective floor in order to restrain the Defendant; (b) dumped the victim’s body; and (c) dumped the flab.

3. Defendant A and Defendant B, as seen above, taken a video image by the victim H using smartphones to assault E and G, Defendant A and Defendant B led the victim to out of the knex, leading the victim’s bomb, and Defendant B took time off the victim’s head with the hand floor.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as the failure to conduct a 14-day medical treatment.

4. Defendant A and Defendant C, from the above car page, carried the flaps of the victim G and put the flaps onto the wall, and Defendant C could not put the victim’s body into the wall.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants H, G, E, and the Defendants;

1. I.D.

arrow