All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s assertion

On October 15, 2014, the Plaintiff suffered injury to the left-hand leg, satisfe, knife, etc. on the left-hand knife, by falling off from the above vehicle due to sudden stopping (hereinafter “instant accident”) while getting on or off the clicking vehicle owned by Defendant B (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

After the accident of this case, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from the Franchisium operated by Defendant C.

With respect to the injury caused by the instant accident, the Plaintiff received medical treatment after receiving insurance benefits (hereinafter “industrial accident benefits”) prescribed by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”).

After the instant accident, on April 27, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service on the ground that the instant accident occurred, and the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service’ Compensation and Welfare Service’s Vice-Governor, who determined that the instant disability grade falls under the remaining condition of general Dong Dong Dongdong, and determined it as class 14 and 10 (hereinafter “instant disability grade determination”).

On October 19, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a claim for additional medical care and additional medical care with the Vice-Governor of the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service who continued to receive industrial accident compensation benefits on the ground that there was an "Apparent language disorder" due to an additional injury to the injury, but rejected approval on the ground that there was no causal link between the instant accident and the apparent language disorder.

(hereinafter “instant non-approval disposition”). Defendant B, despite the existence of a separate owner of the instant vehicle, obtained insurance proceeds by unlawfully reporting himself/herself as the driver of the instant vehicle, and attempted to kill the Plaintiff. Employees of G insurance, the non-life insurer of the instant vehicle, unfairly induced the Plaintiff to receive treatment by personal insurance, not industrial accident insurance, not industrial accident insurance, which is the representative director of the G insurance, and Defendant C, the president of the F. The Plaintiff’s medical confirmation, etc.