The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable to the Defendant: (a) the fact that the Defendant recognizes and reflects his own criminal act; (b) the Defendant’s tolerance or sexual impulse disorder appears to have caused the instant criminal act; (c) the symptoms appear to have been improved to some extent through mental and medical treatment after the instant crime; and (d) there were no additional damage, such as the spread of photographs taken by the victim.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant after entering a female toilet with the victim for the purpose of photographing the victim's appearance. The part of the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her sens.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the 3rd page of the judgment of the court below is "additional".