logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원밀양지원 2016.12.13 2016가단1511
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's order for the payment of the goods price case against the plaintiff was issued by the Changwon District Court 2014 tea 686.

Reasons

1. 청구의 표시 원고는 1996. 10. 16. 피고로부터 사슴엑기스를 298,000원에 구입하면서 그 대금은 같은 날부터 10회로 분할하여 매달 지급하되 이를 지체할 때에는 연 20%의 지연손해금을 지급하기로 하였다.

When the plaintiff delays the above payment, the defendant received a payment order (No. 2014.686) as of November 20, 2014.

However, the above monetary liability is required for the three-year extinctive prescription pursuant to Article 163 subparagraph 3 of the Civil Code, and the above monetary liability has already been extinguished at the time when the defendant applied for the payment order.

Therefore, compulsory execution based on the above payment order against the plaintiff should not be permitted.

2. Judgment made by confession of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act and the main sentence of Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow