A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 01:50 on June 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at “cafeteria” located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) the Defendant received a report of 112 that the Defendant avoided disturbance without paying the drinking value; and (c) the Defendant asked the Defendant to ask the Defendant’s personal information and to return home; (d) the Defendant raised an objection to the said D and E, and the said D and E, “I am at the same seat of this Chewing typ, match, satra, and the dead sat at the seat of the said police officer, who was on the table of the said police officer, and 2 through 3 times the table of the soldiers; and (d) when the police officer was head of the said soldiers, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate handling of the police officer’s body by entering one of the following actions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each statement of the F;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the 112 Report Processing Table to the C police box at night; and

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under the Criminal Act, the Defendant asserted that he was in a state of mental or physical weakness or mental loss under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime, the records show that he was in a state of mental or physical weakness or mental loss. Thus, even though he was aware that he had drinking at the time of committing the instant crime, the Defendant was aware of drinking, and in full view of the circumstances such as the background and result of the instant case’s act before and after committing the instant crime, it cannot be deemed that he did not have the ability

The reason for sentencing is that the police officers who are performing legitimate official duties are able to take a dangerous object, such as the illness, which is a dangerous object, and are threatening.