logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.30 2016가합557529
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City: KRW 30,700,000 and the same shall be from May 30, 2014 to June 30, 2017.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The party status network E (hereinafter “the deceased”) prepared a public official examination for about four years from around 2009 to passed the Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Defendant Seoul Special Metropolitan City”)’s recruitment examination for public officials in research service around 2013. The G Research Institute, a research institute affiliated with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, (hereinafter “this case Research Institute”), who works as a public official in health research service, from August 1, 2013 to January 201, and from February 2014, he/she worked as a public official in full-time public official in health research service.

The plaintiff is the husband of the deceased.

Defendant B, C, and D worked together with the Deceased at the instant research institute as a public official affiliated with the Defendant Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Defendant B was affiliated with the Research Planning Department, and Defendant C and D were affiliated with micro-organism from August 1, 2013 to March 2014, and the Deceased and Defendant D worked in the same office.

The chief of the department with micro-organism of this case was H from August 1, 2013 to March 12, 2014. The name of the department with micro-organism was changed to I on March 13, 2014, and the name of the department with micro-organism was changed to that of micro-organism around March 2014.

B. Defendant B, such as the damage of sexual harassment by the Deceased, performed alcohol at a meeting place on August 29, 2013, and said Defendant B as “hertour” in a large sound to the Deceased.

On October 2013, Defendant C told Defendant C, who was asked by the JJ of other female researchers on whether the physical training was for one and two days at the seat of the Deceased in the presence of Defendant C in the company.

At around 15:00 on November 12, 2013, Defendant D told Defendant D to “I send the original copy to the Deceased while I am going on the Internet and talking about the Deceased and I am on the side.”

The Deceased, at the time of November 21, 2013, provided his education to the employees so that sexual harassment and verbal violence do not occur without considering the specific real names of Defendant B, C, and D, who was the director of the research institute of this case.

arrow