logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.06.08 2015고단871
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal records and criminal facts [criminal records] The defendant appealed on January 29, 2015, who was sentenced to one year of imprisonment by the Jeonju District Court for a crime such as fraud, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the Jeonju District Court 2015No 179 on June 26, 2015 and two years of a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the same year.

7.4. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around February 1, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that “The victim C would have repaid 40 million won after one year if he/she lent 42 million won out of the 420 million won which was paid for the termination of the insurance contract, and he/she would have repaid 40 million won out of the 42 million won which was paid for the termination of the insurance contract.”

However, on December 13, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 50 million from E as an installment savings premium, but was unable to repay it, and the Defendant was causing damage equivalent to the same amount to E, and around July 27, 201 and the same year.

9. 21. Around two occasions the defendant has worked as an insurance solicitor.

In the case of embezzlement by using the 20 million won stored for the branch of the AIA life-based company for personal purposes, such as investing in shares, and in the case of taking money from the injured party as living expenses, etc., even if the injured party borrows money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to complete payment.

Nevertheless, around February 3, 2012, the Defendant received delivery of KRW 40 million from the damaged party to the Gwangju Bank account in the name of the Defendant under the pretext of borrowing money.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On July 20, 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the effect that “The victim F will make a high yield of 15% if there are good goods in Samsung Securities and the three-month deposit is made” with the victim F.

However, the facts have been caused by the Defendant to E as above, and AI life Gwangju.

arrow