logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.09.19 2019구단4113
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, who is a national of the Republic of Egyp of Egyp (hereinafter “Egyp”) of the Republic of Egypt, entered the Republic of Korea on September 28, 2016 as a foreigner of B-2 (tourism) sojourn status.

B. On October 10, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on October 16, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the “profuge” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (1951 Convention, hereinafter “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee 1967”).

C. On November 27, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on November 29, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was conducted by Egypt, and the Plaintiff’s submission was demanded by B to transfer this company to its own.

In addition, the plaintiff also received the request to join the B organization.

The plaintiff's reference refused the request of the B organization, but thereafter there is an investigation as to whether Egypt police is in a relationship with B organization.

If the plaintiff will return to Egypt, it is hard to say that not only the plaintiff's father, but also the plaintiff will be threatened by the Egypt police by misunderstanding that the plaintiff is related to the B organization.

In addition, since the plaintiff's reference and the plaintiff did not accept the request of B organizations, it is difficult to be threatened by B organizations.

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.

arrow