1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant, who served as an employee, intentionally or negligently destroyed the press machine and caused damages to KRW 4,180,000 for the repair cost, and that the Plaintiff did not notify the Plaintiff of the above breakdown, thereby causing damages to KRW 39,00,00 due to the occurrence of the production difference, and that the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the total amount of damages KRW 43,180,000 and damages for delay.

B. The Defendant’s work as an employee from June 23, 2014 to May 2016, and the fact that the press machine was broken out while the Defendant was working for the press machine at the early entrance does not conflict between the parties.

However, in full view of the purport of the oral argument as to the statement No. 5, inasmuch as there is no evidence to support that the Plaintiff was properly installed on the press machine, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant intentionally or negligently destroyed the press machine, and there is no other evidence to support the above, in light of the above circumstances, the Defendant did not notify the Plaintiff of the fact that the press machine was damaged.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.