logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2019.07.04 2019고단205
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On October 17, 1997, at around 01:41 on October 17, 1997, the Defendant, an employee, operated the truck while loaded with freight of 11.1 ton on the 4 livestock, in excess of 10 tons during the limitation of freight trucks of 18 tons belonging to the Defendant at the coast guard and Gun office located in the Gyeonggi-gun, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by the road management authority.

2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995 and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) which provides the grounds for the punishment of the instant case, "where an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation, which shall also be imposed on the corporation, shall also be imposed on the corporation," which has lost its effect in accordance with the decision of unconstitutionality of the Constitutional Court (see Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Joint)), and the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act."

arrow