1. The Defendant’s KRW 25 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 20% per annum from September 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015.

1. A claim for refund against the down payment of 50 million won; and

A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that is engaged in assistant contribution business in the leisure Dong-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

(2) On November 2, 2012, the Plaintiff Company entered into a labor contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “Plaintiff Company”). (3) At the time of entering into the instant labor contract, the Plaintiff Company paid a total of KRW 25 million to the Defendant under the pretext of termination contract deposit, as KRW 25 million, and KRW 5 million under the pretext of termination contract deposit (loan). (4) The instant labor contract (certificate No. 2 subparag. 2) contains the following contents: (a) Although the instant contract for termination of contract deposit under Article 2 subparag. 2 is referred to as “extinctive prescription” under the contract for termination of contract deposit, it appears that the term “extinctive prescription period” is referred to as “extinctive prescription period” under the context of this contract.

(Omission) Article 4 (Termination of Contracts, Compensation for Damages, etc.)

1. A may terminate the contract in case of neglecting the duties of B, or gathering inside and outside the country the officers and employees of A or B; and

2. If Party B commits an act contrary to the interest of Party A, Party A may terminate this Agreement.

3. If B refuses to carry out a business or fails to carry out any other contractual obligations without any justifiable reason, A may terminate this contract;

4. If this contract is terminated during the term of the contract due to the above contents, etc., Eul shall return 50 million won (50 million won) received from Gap at the time of termination of the contract to Gap in cash.

(Omission) (5) On the other hand, around July 2013, the Defendant had a serious dispute with the employees B as a dividend issue of a subsidized contributor. In this regard, the Plaintiff Company was solicited to retire from the Plaintiff Company, and on July 31, 2013.