logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.26 2019나32476
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

The reasoning for the judgment in this case shall be cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act in addition to the following judgments.

In full view of the whole purport of the oral argument in the video of Eul evidence 2, the following circumstances are revealed: (a) the Plaintiff’s vehicle prior to the collision accident was located behind the Defendant’s vehicle; and (b) the Plaintiff’s vehicle was trying to overtake the Defendant vehicle despite having already been in excess of the Defendant’s vehicle, and rather, attempted to overtake the Defendant vehicle without accelerating or yield the course; (c) the Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred due to the failure of the Plaintiff’s driver to entirely anticipate the change of course of the Defendant vehicle; and (d) it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred due to the overall negligence of the Defendant vehicle. The lower court’

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow