logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2019.02.21 2018고단463
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the defendant shall be sentenced to the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Injury) and violation of the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) are those engaged in driving service to capture B Poters,

On November 13, 2018, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 17:30 on November 13, 2018, and proceeded at a speed from the intersection where it is impossible to accurately understand the road of Doc in front of the south-Namnam-gun, to the direction of requisition.

There is a duty of care to the driver of every motor vehicle driving in this place on the asphalt road with a center line of one lane, which has a duty of care to safely proceed to the right side of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and proceeds over the center line in order to overtake the G motorcycle of the Victim F (74 years old) driving in the same direction in the front bank.

In other words, while returning to the right side of the road, the motor bicycle was driven on the side of the victim's motorcycle by shocking the hand hand on the left side of the victim's motorcycle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim, such as a climatic climatic cliflaf, which had no address in the two cases where treatment is required for about six weeks, and also escaped without immediately stopping the victim despite the damage of the victim’s motorcycle to the extent that the repair cost, such as the clifa, was damaged, even though 915,000 won was destroyed by the victim’s motorcycle.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at a section of about 42 km from the front of the Jindo-gun, the Hamnam-gun, the Hamnam-gun, in which the trade name in front of the Jindo-gun, in front of the Jindo-gun, cannot be known at the time indicated in paragraph (1), to the H again, operated the B Poter, the Posbus scoo-sc

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of I and F. The police officer 1.

arrow