1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into an automobile insurance contract with C with D (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Defendant on June 9, 2018 with respect to F Motor Vehicles for which the Yeongdeungpo-dong 4, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant Motor Vehicles”) drives the path in front of the Yeongdeungpo Fire Station (hereinafter “Defendant Motor Vehicles”).

B. E and the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle run as a two-lane straight line along the two-lane straight line in front of the crosswalk installed at the above time before the signal change. The driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle moved to the left left turn turn as they followed.

C. However, there was an accident in which E prior to the two lanes did not turn on the sudden direction lights, and the two lanes shift into the left one lane, which is the right-hand left-hand one, and the plaintiff's vehicle and the latter are faced with each other (hereinafter "the accident in this case"). D.

On June 28, 2019, the Plaintiff paid 6,570,000 won for the repair cost for the Plaintiff’s vehicle caused by the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 4 video, purport of whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability;

가. 청구원인에 대한 판단 위 인정사실에 의하면 이 사건 사고는 �향지시등 작동 및 차로변경 시 요구되는 다른 차량 주시의무 등 진로변경에 필요한 주의의무를 다하지 않은 E의 과실로 발생하였으므로 피고 차량 보험회사인 피고는 원고 차량 손해에 대하여 보험금을 지급한 원고에게 보험금액 상당의 돈을 구상할 의무가 있다.

B. The summary of the allegation 1 regarding the Defendant’s assertion is that the instant accident, in addition to the negligence of E, changes the lanes on the crosswalks where change of course is prohibited, and the negligence of the Plaintiff’s driver who neglected the duty of Jeonju and the duty of concession driving.