1. On April 8, 2014, with respect to traffic accidents that occurred in front of a restaurant located in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan Government B, the Plaintiff is the Defendant.

1. The plaintiff asserted that the defendant was not liable for damages since the accident attributable to the defendant was caused by the whole negligence of the defendant to the Busan metropolitan bus, which is the bus belonging to Busan metropolitan bus, which caused no liability for damages. Accordingly, the defendant set up a door before the bus in order to board the bus while stopping the bus. However, the above bus neglected it, while neglecting it, the defendant was shocked to the rear part of the bus and suffered an injury to the defendant, such as an injury to the defendant due to the flabing of the bus, etc., so the plaintiff is liable for damages to the defendant.

살피건대, 갑 제1 내지 9호증의 각 기재와 이 법원의 검증결과에 변론전체의 취지를 더하면 피고가 2014. 4. 8. 22:18경 부산 금정구 B에 있는 C식당 앞길에 서행 중인 원고 버스 앞을 지나서 그 옆으로 걸어가다가 버스 뒷부분에 부딪혔는데, 이는 버스가 정상보행하던 피고를 충격한 것이 아니라 피고 스스로 중심을 잃은 탓에 몸이 버스 쪽으로 기우뚱하게 기울이지다가 마침 그 옆으로 진행하던 원고 버스에 충격당하였던 사실, 피고는 당시 혈중알콜농도 0.264%의 주취상태였던 사실 등을 인정할 수 있다.

Therefore, the instant traffic accident is an accident that occurred due to the Defendant’s fault, rather than the Defendant’s fault, since it is extremely sufficient to recognize a bus driver’s breach of duty of care because the instant traffic accident was driven by the bus in which the Defendant is standing.

2. In conclusion, the Plaintiff’s obligation against the Defendant regarding the instant traffic accident is nonexistent, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the Plaintiff’s claim.