logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (전주) 2014.07.01 2014노84
강도상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles shall not be a legitimate ground for appeal as asserted only on the first day of the trial after the date on which the appeal was not timely filed, but it shall be determined in the trial.

Although the defendant's thief and the thief's thief's thief's thief's thief's thief's thief's thief's thief's th

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, quasi-Robbery is established when the thief commits assault or intimidation is committed for the purpose of resisting property recovery in an opportunity for larceny. Here, the term “opportune of larceny” refers to cases where the thief and the victim are at the scene of the thief and are linked to the location of the thief and where the victim is in contact with the location of the thief, and where the victim is in contact with the location of the thief or the time of the thief and thus the victim is likely to arrest the criminal, and where the victim is in a position of trackingf or where it is difficult for the victim to secure a new disease as he is arrested

(2) The Defendant’s defense counsel at around February 11, 201, and the Defendant’s defense counsel at night, on October 23, 2001, appears to have violated the Act on the Punishment of Violence, etc., by taking into account the following circumstances based on the above legal doctrine: (a) return to the instant case based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court; and (b) the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court; (c) the Defendant’s defense counsel at around February 12:50, 201; and (d) the Defendant’s defense counsel at night, on the ground that the time when the crime was committed was committed,

(See its summary). At the victim’s home, the victim’s office.

arrow