1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 25,00,000 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 5,000,000 for Plaintiff B; and (c) for each of them, from June 22, 2014 to August 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. From May 2014, Plaintiff A received counseling treatment in relation to child abuse from a specialized child protection agency D. At the Defendant’s recommendation, the head of the counseling team at the above agency, participated in a child campaign (period: from June 21, 2014 to June 22, 2014; accommodation: the room located in the wife population at the time of tolerance) managed by the above agency.

B. From June 21, 2014 to June 22, 2014, between 22:00 and 07:00 on June 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) from the first floor of the above child camp accommodation to the above child camp; (b) from the time when Plaintiff A was diving, the Defendant puts his fingers into a son with her body; and (c) made an indecent act on Plaintiff A’s sexual flag and port several occasions.

C. On June 21, 2014, between 21:00 and 22:00, the Defendant taken six copies of Plaintiff A’s balone photograph, which was Handphones possessed against Plaintiff A’s will, which was Handphones.

The defendant Na, C

On December 12, 2014, the court was prosecuted as the facts stated in the port (hereinafter “instant tort”) and was ordered to receive probation for five years of probation period and three years of probation, community service for 200 hours of sexual assault treatment and 40 hours of sexual assault treatment, due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a minor indecent act under thirteen years of age, Kamera, etc.) in this court.

E. After the tort of this case, Plaintiff A was diagnosed by the E Hospital, such as “compact with severe stress with bad reputation,” “ex post facto stress disorder, activity disorder, and the influence of attention,” and Plaintiff B, the Plaintiff’s father, around January 15, 2015, was diagnosed, including “compact with bad stress with bad reputation.”

F. Around December 4, 2014, the Defendant deposited KRW 10,000,000 for the Plaintiff around December 4, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the facts of recognition of the above liability for damages, the defendant is obligated to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs for the tort of this case against the plaintiff A.