beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 23, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dok-in Vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.A.) (hereinafter referred to as "accident") driving a cub-in vehicle B on September 23, 2013, and driving a cub-in vehicle B on September 23, 2013, and driving a two-lane out of the four-lane of the front 106-6 KT
At that place, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, and there is a DNA car driven by the victim C(34 years old) prior to the collision in the signal atmosphere, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to look at the front line well, and to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was in the front part of the car driven by the Defendant, following the car driven by the Defendant, with the vehicle driven by the Defendant, and accordingly, the Defendant was under the influence of driving by the victim E (the 64 years old) who was under the influence of the vehicle and was under the influence of the vehicle driven by the victim E (the 64 age).
Ultimately, the Defendant: (a) committed an injury to the victim C and the passenger G (n, 29 years old) of the vehicle operating the franchise due to the foregoing occupational negligence; (b) inflicted an injury upon the victim E, who driven a rocketing taxi vehicle, requiring three-day medical treatment due to the light fluoral salt, etc.; (c) inflicted an injury upon the victim H(57 years old); (d) who was a taxi passenger; and (e) suffered an injury requiring two-time medical treatment due to the fluoral salt, tension, etc.; and (e) at the same time, the repair cost of the fluor vehicle; and (e) around KRW 5,343,976 for the fluor vehicle; and (e) around KRW 2,620,846 for the fluoral vehicle, even though each fluoral vehicle was damaged, she did not immediately stop the vehicle and take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.
2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act;