Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in urban bus driving service B.

On July 26, 2013, the Defendant driven the above city bus on July 26, 2013, and proceeded with the North Korean language intersection in the Dong-dong of Gwangjubuk-gu from the new Changdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely according to good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to enter a stop signal to the right side of the instant bus, which was driven by the victim C (the aged 47) who entered the intersection in accordance with the going signal from the right side of the course direction by negligence in violation of the signal, and went to the left, was shocked into the front side of the said bus.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as drillings, chills, and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of occurrence of a traffic accident prepared C;

1. The actual condition survey report, the evidence and photographs of the scene of a traffic accident, and the internal investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the Detention in Labor House seems to require a strict punishment of the defendant in light of the fact that the defendant caused a traffic accident by gross negligence, which is a violation of signal, and that the defendant again committed the crime of this case despite the fact that he had been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime in the past. However, the defendant is divided into and reflected against his mistake, the defendant has no criminal record except seven times a fine, and the vehicle of the defendant is not limited to the degree of injury of the victim, and the degree of injury of the victim is covered by the mutual aid association.