The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the Defendant’s decision on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing, and the circumstances leading up to drinking are considered, the above circumstances appear to have been sufficiently considered in the lower court’s judgment, and the Defendant was subject to two times or a fine for the same kind of crime. The instant case was committed during the period of suspension of execution, and the Defendant had already been punished by a fine of KRW 2.5 million on January 9, 2012 when he was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million in the branch branch of the Daegu District Court on January 9, 2012, again committed the instant crime despite being sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million during the period of suspension of execution, and other factors indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the motive and background leading up to the instant crime, means, methods, and results, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the lower court’s imprisonment (eight

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.