The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant was aware of the facts charged with the victim B through the introduction and display.

From May 14:20 to 19:00 on May 26, 2019, the Defendant sent the phrase “the Defendant, regardless of whether the Defendant is a manuous video, with a rate set C, with a rate set at C, with a rate set at the end of a video, and with a width, and with a point set at the end of a set, and then threatened the Defendant with a threat that he would spread sexual intercourse if the victim does not respond to sexual relations.”

2. Determination is an offense falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the intent expressed by the victim under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the written agreement, it can be recognized that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on October 31, 2019, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.