logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.05.18 2016구합23623
기타(금전) 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 9, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition on the website of the Busan Metropolitan Office of Education to the effect that the Plaintiff maintains an illegal extracurricular under the Seo-gu Busan Metropolitan Office of Education’s B apartment, 102 Dong 703.

On June 14, 2016, the Defendant investigated the above site and confirmed the violation of Article 14-2(1) of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Private Teaching Institutes and Extracurricular Lessons (hereinafter “Private Teaching Institutes Act”), instructed the violator to discontinue extracurricular lessons, report it to a private extracurricular teacher and teach him/her to do so in accordance with the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, and notified the competent police station that the violation will be accused.

B. On July 6, 2016, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay a monetary reward for the above illegal excess report. However, on July 11, 2016, the Defendant rejected the payment of a monetary reward on the ground that the Plaintiff did not submit an application for a monetary reward and evidentiary materials, thereby not become subject to the payment of a monetary reward.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

On August 30, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted an application for a monetary reward to the Defendant on August 30, 2016, and the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on August 31, 2016 that the Plaintiff is not eligible for a monetary reward for the following reasons:

The extra leaflet submitted by the Plaintiff as evidentiary materials does not fall under the photographs or videos of the teaching act, which is the evidence payment requirement of the monetary reward under Article 14-4 of the Enforcement Rule of the Busan Metropolitan City Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of Private Teaching Institutes and Extracurricular Lessons, and reply to the Plaintiff as to the above case on July 11, 2016. The reported person (C) registered the Defendant as a private extracurricular teacher on June 14, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Eul's evidence Nos. 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was filed by the defendant by discovering unregistered extracurricular lessons through the plaintiff's report to the investigation agency.

arrow