logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.11.06 2013고단1061
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 28, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of one million won or more as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on April 28, 2008, and 1.5 million won or more as a fine for the same crime at the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on December 9, 201.

At around 12:30 on July 6, 2013, the Defendant driven a B-car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.114% on the front of the Korean copid located in the city of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Gu.

As a result, although the defendant had the power of violating driving under the influence of alcohol more than twice, he again driven the car under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written appraisal of blood alcohol and a written report of the master driver;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of investigation reports (a report on confirmation of the same criminal records) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant, who was punished by a fine as stated in the judgment of the court below due to drinking driving, without being well aware of the fact that he was sentenced to a fine; (b) caused an accident to the extent that he was sent to the hospital; (c) the Defendant himself caused an accident due to a dump truck; (d) however, the liability for the crime is not less vulnerable in light of the fact that the vehicle damaged by drinking is a dump truck, but there is no other criminal record than the judgment; (d) there is no other criminal record than the judgment; and (e) there is no other criminal record of suspended sentence or heavier; and (e) there is a reflective history of the Defendant’s age

arrow