logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.04.08 2015고단2654
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving in drinking), in support of the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of 2015, and on October 29, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving in drinking) by the same court on October 29, 2015, and was in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.

On November 4, 2015, the Defendant driven a DNA car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.055% from approximately 30 meters to the front road of the Gwangju church located in the same Dong, from the Song Jong-dong, around 22:53 on November 4, 2015.

On December 28, 2015, the Defendant driven a F cafeteria in Gwangju-si, Gyeonggi-do on December 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) while driving a DG-based car in front of the F cafeteria in Gwangju-do without the driver’s license while driving the DG-based car while drinking the alcohol, he/she driven the Defendant under the influence of alcohol, including a snick G belonging to the traffic control division of the Gwangju Police Station, dnife the Defendant, dnife on his/her face, hhhing the horse, and dnife the pedestrian’s age.

Even though there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, the person did not comply with a request for the measurement of alcohol without justifiable grounds, even though he/she demanded to comply with the measurement of alcohol by inserting the whole breath for about three minutes from around 22:10 on the same day to around 20 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Highest 2654"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The circumstantial report on the driving of a brewing engineer;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and written rulings of each summary order "2016 Height 170";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The circumstantial report of the driver involved in the driving, the report on detection of the driver involved in the driving, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking) concerning criminal facts, Article 148-2(1)2 and Article 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of refusing to measure drinking), Article 148-2(1)2 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 152 subparag. 1 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow