1. It was concluded on September 29, 2017 between the Defendant and Nonparty C as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 and 2.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 7, 2017, the Plaintiff brought a lawsuit against Nonparty C seeking a judgment on the change of a person with parental authority or a child support under the Daejeon Family Court’s 2017-Ma1027, which was a legal couple with Nonparty C, and on November 16, 2018, the said court changed the person with parental authority and the person with custody of the principal of the case to the applicant.

2.The other party shall be the claimant;

A. 6 million won for the past child support of the principal of the case and 5% interest per annum from the day following the day when the adjudication is final and conclusive;

B. From August 15, 2017 to the time the principal of the case becomes an adult, the judgment was rendered with the purport that the principal of the case shall pay KRW 500,000 per month as of the end of each month, and the said judgment was finalized on December 6, 2018.

B. On September 29, 2017, Nonparty C is Nonparty C’s Schedule 1 and 2’s Schedule 1 and 2’s Schedule.

In relation to the defendant, the mortgage contract of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "mortgage contract of this case") is established between the defendant and the defendant.

B. On October 10, 2017, the registration of the establishment of a neighboring real estate under the name of the Defendant was completed for the instant real estate on the first list, and on October 11, 2017, the registration of the establishment of a neighboring real estate under the name of the Defendant was completed for the instant real estate on the second list.

The registration of the establishment of each of the above units is 'the registration of the establishment of each of the units in this case'.

(C) On December 31, 2018, the amount not paid by Nonparty C to the Plaintiff is KRW 23,020,548 [23,00,000 x 5% x 25/365] [3,00 won] 17,00,000 won (i.e., August 15, 2017 to December 31, 2018) (i.e., the real estate in the instant case is the sole property of Nonparty C, and at the time of the establishment of each of the instant mortgages, Nonparty C was in excess of obligations. [The fact that there is no dispute over recognition, i.e., evidence Nos. 1 and 2, evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and evidence No. 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. Determination

A. On June 7, 2017, the Plaintiff established the preserved claim against Nonparty C as the Daejeon Family Court’s 2017-Ma1027.