A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:30 on October 7, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force from 4 hours to 30 minutes from 05:00 on the same day, such as smoking tobacco in the said restaurant, which prevents the victim from taking delivery. The Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force from 4 hours to 30 minutes from 05:00 on the same day.

2. On October 7, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the place specified in paragraph (1) around 05:15, and reported that the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business as above, the Defendant obstructed the police officers’ legitimate performance of duties in relation to the handling of reporting duties, protection of the principal and criminal investigation, etc., by assaulting the Defendant, on the part of the police officers, F, etc., who were the police officers belonging to the Gyeonggi Mine Police Station E District, who were dispatched to the said place, and were asked questions about the occurrence of the instant incident from F, etc., who were asked him/her about the background of the instant incident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. All circumstances, including the fact that the court recognizes the error of sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act and the absence of criminal records exceeding the fine;