The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) at the time of each of the instant crimes, the account that uses the separate name “E” in the Kakao Scaro was used by other persons, not D.

Therefore, as to the facts charged of this case, there is no legitimate complaint by the victim who was the user of the account, the dismissal judgment should be sentenced.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, D is sufficiently recognized that not only at the time of each of the instant crimes but also at the time of the accusation, a separate account of “E” was used in the Kakao Scaro as well as at the time of the accusation, so the court below

In light of the above, the decision of conviction against the defendant is correct, and there is no error of mistake as to the facts alleged by the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, in the summary of the evidence of the judgment below, since it is apparent that the “Crographs of the comments on the Crops and F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f