logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 05. 16. 선고 2017두34360 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 토지는 고유목적사업에 직접 사용한 것에 해당하지 않고 비사업용토지에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court (Cheongju)-2016-Nu-10153 ( October 18, 2017)

Title

(C) The land of this case is not directly used for the proper purpose business and constitutes the land for non-business use.

Summary

(C) The court below held that the land of this case is not directly used for the plaintiff's proper purpose business, and the land of this case should be a cemetery in the public record as well as a cemetery in order to be exempted from property tax.

Cases

2017Du34360 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing Corporate Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

000

Defendant-Appellee

00. Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court (Cheongju) Decision 2016Nu10153 Decided January 18, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow