1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The Defendant leased the office from the Plaintiff in the name of C from March 6, 2013 to March 8, 2015. Since the Defendant left the office without settling accounts of unpaid electricity charges, repair charges for the leased object after the completion of the said lease, etc., the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff unpaid electricity charges and repair charges for the leased object.

② Even though the Defendant received KRW 1,637,00 from the Plaintiff as the repair cost of the office leased by concluding a lease agreement as above, it did not use it as the repair cost of the office. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to return the said amount to the Plaintiff as unjust enrichment.

③ On April 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed the Plaintiff’s desire before Plaintiff House; (b) insulting the Plaintiff by avoiding disturbance; (c) insulting the Plaintiff; and (d) invaded upon the Plaintiff’s residence without permission; and (c) thereby, is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages incurred therefrom.

④ In fact, the Defendant committed a fraudulent act of filing an application for payment order with the court No. 2015 tea408 against the Plaintiff by means of a loan, even though he/she had the purpose of refunding the lease deposit. The Defendant is responsible for compensating the Plaintiff for any loss incurred thereby.

B. In light of the judgment, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge all the facts alleged by the Plaintiff, including the Defendant’s damage to the Plaintiff’s goods, the unpaid amount of electric utility charges, the Defendant’s receipt from the Plaintiff of KRW 1,637,00 from the office repair cost, the Defendant’s insult, defamation, intrusion upon residence, misconduct, litigation fraud, etc., and the Plaintiff’s occurrence of damages therefrom, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.