beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On November 05, 2018, the Plaintiff driving a B K5-si around 07:50 on the 07:50 on the 07:0, the Plaintiff got the driving seat of the victim C driver’s D- driver’s D- driver’s car driving seat, which was left left to the left pursuant to the new subparagraph, in the front part of the Plaintiff’s taxi, at the front part of the Plaintiff’s taxi, while the signal was changed to the stop signal at the speed of about 66 kilometers in the speed of 803 7-lane in the front of the 7-lane in the city of bankruptcy park at the seat of the new railway station, while the signal was changed to the stop signal at the same speed.
Ultimately, at around 08:35 on the same day, the Plaintiff suffered from the victim E (n, 52 years of age) who was on a taxi due to the above occupational negligence and caused the death of the victim E (n, e.g., the passenger) by a long-term departure from the G Hospital located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, and the victim C (the driver of the other vehicle), who is the driver of the other vehicle, suffered around 2 weeks of the light finite, etc., and the victim C (the finite, the 16 years of age), who is the other passenger of the vehicle, the left-hand side of the floor, which
B. On January 15, 2019, the Defendant issued a notice of a decision to revoke the Plaintiff’s driver’s license (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on January 15, 2019 pursuant to Article 93(2) of the Road Traffic Act on the ground that the Plaintiff’s given the Plaintiff a mark of 125 points (one point of 15 points of 15 points of 25 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 15 points of 201 points of 15 points of 15 points of 201.
C. On March 29, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition. However, the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for administrative appeal on April 23, 2019.