Title
Whether the plaintiffs have no purpose of the title trust agreement and tax return agreement or not
Summary
(The judgment of the first instance) The Plaintiffs were entitled to a title trust agreement from the title trustee, and the Plaintiffs were subject to a tax avoidance purpose in that they avoided capital gains tax and comprehensive income tax, and the initial disposition is legitimate.
Related statutes
Donation of trust property under Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act
Cases
Seoul High Court 2015Nu65638 Revocation of Disposition Imposing Gift Tax
Plaintiff
AA and 7
Defendant
00. Head of tax office and 5
Conclusion of Pleadings
December 2, 2016
Imposition of Judgment
on October 26, 2016
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
Each gift tax imposition disposition listed in the attached Table 1 attached hereto by the Defendants shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The part against the plaintiffs in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the gift tax listed in the attached Table 1 by the defendants
Each disposition of imposition against the plaintiffs in the disposition of imposition shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows, except for the rejection of each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 33 (including additional numbers) which is insufficient to admit the plaintiffs’ assertion as evidence submitted in the trial, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance court. Thus, the part which is dismissed or added by the court pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
○ 6th of the first instance judgment, “The evidence mentioned above” was added to “the results of inquiry and reply to the fact-finding securities of this court.”
○ The 8th judgment of the first instance court stated that "the plaintiff" in the 11th judgment of the first instance court was "the plaintiff."
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims shall be dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of the reasons. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.