logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.08.11 2015고정694
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:00 on June 24, 2013, the Defendant sent cash cards, etc. to the national bank account (Account Number B) and the agricultural bank account (Account Number C) opened under the name of the Defendant through Kwikwikset Service Articles, at around 14:00, around 24, 2013.

As a result, the Defendant transferred the means of access to electronic financial transactions to the name partner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on occurrence, and a report on internal investigation (related to compensation for the amount of damage);

1. Application of statutes on warrant correspondence data (personal information on holders of the Nonghyup Bank Account and details of transactions);

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant filed a request for formal trial against the summary order and did not appear twice in the trial and rendered the judgment without the statement of the defendant. As a result of examining various circumstances that form the sentencing conditions based on the sentencing precedent of the same kind of case, the summary order cannot be deemed to be heavy.

arrow