Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 26, 2015, at around 14:00, the Defendant found the victim D (n, 65 years of age)’s “E beauty room” in the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, as a part of the Defendant’s home tenant, and found the victim’s name and head as “the victim’s name and head are only friend friend friend, and the victim’s face was faceed with a plastic summary, and the date of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

2. The Defendant assaulted the Victim F (73) who was at a show at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, on the ground that “The Victim F (73) was fumpted with a dump fume at a dume,” and the Victim F (73) was fumped with a fump fume at one time, and the victim was fumpted with a fume with a fume with a fume, and

3. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim D’s beauty room business by force by force, while taking the victim D and F at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and taking a bath for about 10 minutes, and allowing the customers who were in the beauty room to take a disturbance over about 10 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Each investigation report (the phone call, etc. of a police officer, the attachment of a medical certificate, and whether to treat a victim D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the parts of the victim's body;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that at the time of committing the instant crime, the Defendant was physically and physically in a state of weakness due to hearing disorder, decentralization disorder, etc. However, in light of all the circumstances, such as the background and means of the instant crime, and the conduct before and after the instant crime, the Defendant’s judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was made by distinguishing things at the time of committing the instant crime.