1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s primary main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim are all dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties (1) The Plaintiff is a person who received a collection order (Seoul Central District Court 2015TTTT 3002) with respect to the benefit claim to whom a notary public of E is paid monthly against the E M&A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “S”) with the amount claimed based on the original copy of the No. 1713 of the No. 1714, a monetary loan contract for consumption with the executory power of No. 1713, 2014.

(2) The Defendant is a person who received a collection order (Seoul Central District Court 2015TTT 6156) as to the wage claim to be paid every month for the literature engineering of E with the amount claimed as KRW 70,00,000 on the authentic copy of the No. 172 document of a monetary loan agreement for consumption, which was executed by the Defendant, as a notary public of E, as to the money claim to be paid every month for the original copy of the No. 17

(3) F is E’s wife.

B. The distribution schedule was prepared in the distribution procedure established as Seoul Central District Court D with respect to E’s wage claim on May 2015, and the same court established a distribution schedule with respect to E’s wage claim on October 26, 2015, less enforcement expenses out of KRW 2,239,367, which is the amount to be distributed on October 26, 2015, and less KRW 545,58,553,104, KRW 158,029, KRW 721,032, KRW 240,344, and KRW 2,239, KRW 236, KRW 367, KRW 238, KRW 2531, KRW 375, KRW 245, KRW 3751, KRW 575, KRW 475, KRW 257, KRW 385, KRW 475, KRW 575, KRW 257, KRW 2015.

C. The Plaintiff, as to the dividend, stated an objection against the Defendant as to the entire amount of dividend on each of the aforementioned dates of distribution. D.

E Preparation (1) F and E of the loan certificates and notarial deeds (1) around December 2014,