1. The Defendant’s KRW 113,548,247 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from March 26, 2008 to September 27, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) recognition 1) B B is the Defendant vehicle’s vehicle at around 12:00 on March 26, 2008 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”);

) A driver of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City driving and towing along the three-lane road in front of the Central City of the Eunpyeong-dong 198 East Eastern, and driving in violation of the stop signal by two-lanes from the long-distance flooding area to the long-distance flooding area, and shocked the Plaintiff’s erroneous part of the Plaintiff’s driving that was proceeding on the left side from the right side of the Defendant’s running direction to the left side (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

(2) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was hospitalized on April 15, 2008 after having been hospitalized for about 30 minutes to 40 minutes.

From the time of hospitalization, there has come to be a far away from the right, and there has come to be a difficulty of independent walking from April 2001.

From May 2008 to December 201, 201, the outpatient surgery and rehabilitation treatment were provided from DNA surgery, Epathy, etc., and the symptoms, such as uneasiness, early early January 2012, were diagnosed as stress disorder after being hospitalized in the department of mental health of the sexual health of the Ethyn University.

Since then, it is impossible to walk by itself due to marsonism and it became necessary to assist others in daily life.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle. (b) The recognition of the above liability, the result of the commission of physical examination to the head of the Gangseo-dong Park Hospital (hereinafter “the first appraisal”), and the result of the fact inquiry, and the result of the commission of partial physical examination to the head of the Goansan Hospital (hereinafter “the second appraisal”).

In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the purport of the argument as a result of the fact inquiry, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as an insurer of the Defendant vehicle. (1) The first appraisal recognizes causation between the instant accident and the Plaintiff’s disability (over-the-counter son’s disease) and the second appraisal.