logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.11 2015가단134687
하자보수금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 11,404,250 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 18, 2015 to August 11, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company running the business of waterproofing and cooking, etc., and has been supplied with fireproof clothes, etc. from around 2008 to the Defendant, such as Hacco SP-2, Haccot, heat heat such as hydrogen, smoking materials, and ncot E-II. The Defendant has supplied the Plaintiff with the said materials, etc.

B. On October 7, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) injected and Hacco SP-2 materials supplied by the Defendant at the construction site of the board bridge D-2-5 (hereinafter referred to as “market intersection site”); (b) carried out construction by inserting the Hacco SP-2 and Hacco-2 materials on December 11, 2013; and (c) carried out construction by using the Hacco SP-2 and the Hac ET-2 materials at the site of the board bridge (hereinafter referred to as “SK site”); and (d) on November 23, 2013, the Plaintiff carried out construction by using the Hacco-2 and Hacco-2 in the construction site of the Ilcco-2 and Hacco-2 (hereinafter referred to as “Japan site”).

C. However, around September 2014, around the second floor of underground level, etc., there was an accident of falling off the two parts of a vehicle owned by another person, on which materials supplied by the Defendant were removed from the two parts of a vehicle owned by another person, and at the site of the PO, around October 2014, at the construction section of the 3-6th floor below the ground, and around September 2014 at the construction site of the 3-7 floor below the ground level.

The plaintiff paid 13,717,956 won (in addition to value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) to damaged vehicles, waste disposal expenses, etc. to the field of the field of the market, 4,000,000 won to the field of the market of the market, and 6,367,50 won to the cost of removing mycoi, and 6,367,50 won to the cost of removing mycoi in the field of the Japanese industry, and completed restoration and compensation for damage

E. Meanwhile, the Defendant’s provision of the foregoing materials to the Plaintiff is likely to generate mycot NT on January 5, 2013, but the Haco SP-2 is unlikely to generate mycot due to exposure.

arrow