Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for two years, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants in violation of the Child Reinstatement Act (child abandonment and neglect) are married couple, Defendant B is the father and wife, Defendant B is the G who is a F minor, the victim I (the current age three years), the victim I (the current age three years) who is a child of H, and the victim I who gives birth to K who is a child of J, and Defendant A is the father and father of the victim.

No person shall abandon a child under his/her protection and supervision, or neglect the basic protection, rearing, medical treatment and education, including food, clothing and shelter.

Nevertheless, on January 2016, the Defendants were urged to deliver and abandon the victims to the needy person on the ground that the Defendants were frighten by the victims, including G, the victim, and the victim in the course of raising K, etc., and Defendant A: (a) sent the victims to the parking lot in the dwelling space in the early night of February 2016, at the time of the police station, at the Mststy L, and then transferred the victims to the coast-based highway access road in the same Sinsan-dong, Seosan-dong; and (b) subsequently, the Defendants did not make any effort to recover the basic protection and rearing conditions of the Defendants, the guardian of the victims, by finding the victims from the above influor, and did not make any effort to recover the basic protection and rearing conditions of the victims, which are the guardians of the victims; (c) thereby, Defendant A was unable to receive an essential contact with the State designated by the State, such as Red Station, A-type liver, and Japanese brain infection prevention and vaccination.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to abandon the victims under their protection and supervision by delivering them to the needy, and neglected fundamental protection, rearing, medical treatment and education including food, clothing and shelter for the victims.

2. No person who violates the Infant Care Act shall receive subsidies for expenses incurred in rearing infants who raise children at home without using a child care center or kindergarten by fraud or other improper means;

Nevertheless, on February 2016, the Defendants entered the victim I (H students) who was brought up at the first police officer home on February 1, 2016.