logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2020.06.10 2020고단207
특수절도등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On January 11, 2018, the Daejeon District Court sentenced one year and eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for special injury, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on May 11, 2019.

1. On November 3, 2019, at around 13:35, the Defendants: (a) were the victim’s residence connected to the Escki operated by the victim D in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu; and (b) Defendant A reported the network, and Defendant A destroyed the entrance door, which was entered the house, and damaged it to the Doropo, and entered the house, and carried the door door with the victim’s seat amounting to KRW 1,75,000 at the market price of KRW 39,00 and a travel room equivalent to KRW 20,000 at the market price of KRW 32,00,000 at the credit cooperative entering Escki.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

2. Defendant A’s residential intrusion upon the victim’s residence came into the residence connected to the Escper operated by the victim D at the time and place described in paragraph (1), and the victim’s dwelling was stolen, and the victim’s dwelling was invaded upon the victim’s dwelling.

3. At around 13:20 on November 3, 2019, Defendant B driven a FNAS car without obtaining a driver’s license from the Do near H restaurant located in Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul to the 232 formation distance from the Do near the Haak-gu, dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Incheon to the dong-gu, dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-do to the 2.3km distance.

4. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act by Defendant B shall operate any motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

The defendant operated the FNAS car which was not covered by the mandatory insurance of motor vehicles at the time and place specified in paragraph 3.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Investigation report (CCTV investigation, etc.);

1. On-site photographs, CCTV photographs (suspects, suspected vehicles) 1.

arrow