A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 1, 2013, at around 21:00, the Defendant: (a) in the Defendant’s residence of Sungsung-si C Apartment 605, 805, and 805, (b) took care of the address of one’s own apartment guard and his family members, and tried to commit suicide in the caric book in which he was removed from his family; (c) two copies of a newspaper on which he was placed on the table was placed in a living room and put the newspaper into a portableter in the middle of and on the floor of the living room; (d) on the other hand, the Defendant reported the 119 safety report center to extinguish the fire in a newspaper, and reported it to the 119 safety report center, thereby extinguishing the fire into a newspaper that was dispatched.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of photographic and investigative reports (No. 5,9)

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 174 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 25 (2) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act, which are statutory mitigation;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., circumstances favorable to the following reasons for sentencing):

1. The defense counsel's assertion about the defense counsel's assertion under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) is asserted to the effect that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder by drinking alcohol at the time of the crime of this case. Thus, according to each protocol of examination of the defendant's prosecutor and police suspect against the defendant, it is recognized that the defendant had drinking alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, but the defendant did not have the ability to make

Since it cannot be seen as having reached a state or weak, the above assertion is rejected.

The reason for sentencing [the scope of applicable sentences in law] The crime of this case is an apartment in which the defendant and his family reside.