The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

All the costs of the original judgment and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not deflare the victim’s breath, and instead, did so by leaving the victim’s dub, and carried the victim’s dub, and carried out dubing on the left dub, but the lower court erred by misapprehending that the Defendant inflicted an injury upon the victim by assaulting the victim, thereby adversely affecting the judgment.

2. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, including the legal statement and investigation report (11 pages of investigation record) of the witness witness D in the court below, namely, the defendant moved to a parking zone at the victim's request and did not get unsatisfed and followed the victim. The victim consistently from the investigation process to the court below, stated that "the victim was faced with the victim's body because he was blick and flick face from the defendant," and the defendant also stated that "the victim was faced with the victim's body by blicking the victim's face in the parking zone column after the crime of this case," and that "the victim was pushed with the victim's face in the parking zone column while the victim was faced with the victim's body," and that the victim was unable to be able to be able to have the victim's body against the victim's victim's complaint and the victim's complaint against the victim's own request by the victim's body."

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that rejected Defendant’s defense suit and convicted Defendant of the facts charged in this case is justifiable.

3. Conclusion.