All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (defendant A: imprisonment of one year and four months, confiscation, confiscation, and defendant B: imprisonment of one year and two months, confiscation, defendant C: imprisonment of eight months, confiscation, defendant D: imprisonment of eight months, confiscation, six months, and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendants recognized their mistakes and reflected, and the fact that the instant crime was committed by proposing the money and valuables provider E first.

On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed under the pretext that the defendants would give money to public officials of an investigative agency and have them deal with it well under the pretext that they would give money to the public officials of an investigative agency, and the shares of each person are very serious in light of the applicable law and content, etc. as the crime was committed, and the crime of this case is committed under the pretext that it would seriously undermine the social trust in the fairness of investigation and the purchase of public duties, etc., and thus, the corresponding punishment is needed.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendants’ respective criminal records, the relationship between the acquired profits, the roles of each of the Defendants in the crime, the background and age of the Defendants, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.