The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, and that the defendant has no criminal record.

However, the crime of this case is not good, and the defendant committed repeatedly the fraud of this case even though he had the same criminal record, and the period of the crime is long, the victim's damage is considerably high, and even though the amount of damage is large, the damage recovery or agreement is not reached up to the trial. Considering the sentencing balance with the defendant's joint defendant, the sentencing balance with the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is clear that the “40, 44” of the 6th parallel 16th parallel of the lower judgment is a clerical error in the “40, 43, and 44”, and each “the 6th parallel of the 6th parallel of the 19th parallel of the lower judgment is a clerical error in the “live message.” Thus, the lower judgment is corrected as it is each modified in accordance with Article 25(1)