The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged is the intention to operate the “C Council member” in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

On October 8, 2012, the Defendant provided vaccination to D, which was entrusted by the public health clinic at the above C Council members, and then claimed for the relevant expenses to the public health clinic. On October 11, 2012, the Defendant claimed KRW 7,710 as medical care benefit expenses, if the victim provided medical treatment that could be claimed for medical care benefits, and then received KRW 7,710 from the victim. From that time to March 31, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 5,343,960 in total by the same method as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Table 525, such as in the list of crimes.

In light of the following circumstances recognized through each evidence duly adopted and investigated in this court, it is difficult to view that the Defendant, even if the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, knew that there was a case where the Defendant could not file a claim for medical care benefits even if he/she conducted a vaccination, by deceiving the victim as if he/she had been aware of the fact that he/she could not file a claim for medical care benefits. In other words, it is difficult to view that the intention of deception was proven to the extent that there was no reasonable doubt, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

In the fact that the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service rendered a medical examination for a disease in the course of conducting a medical examination for vaccination against the will including the defendant, it seems that there is no statement that the medical care benefit claim is impossible (EM No. 29 pages) and other agencies such as public health clinics (No. 14 page 10 page) have sent a statement to the defendant.

Although the defendant knew that the act related to vaccination is impossible to claim medical care benefits.

Even in the case of vaccination.