1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

According to the records, the plaintiffs submitted the complaint in this case to the court on October 19, 2015, and this court, on December 1, 2015, issued an order of correction to the effect that "where it is possible to review whether the claims as stated in paragraph (1) are permitted under the Administrative Litigation Act, it shall submit the grounds therefor to the plaintiffs on December 1, 2015, and, in relation to paragraph (2) of the claim, administrative litigation is sought for cancellation or invalidation of a disposition issued by an administrative agency. Therefore, if the purport of disputing the illegality of a disposition made by an administrative agency, the administrative litigation is to specifically specify the disposition (the subject, date, and counterpart of the disposition), and to prepare and submit the cause of the claim, and the plaintiffs did not correct the defects of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim within the specified period upon receipt of the order of correction on December 4, 2015.

Thus, an order to dismiss a complaint shall be issued pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 254(2) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act. However, since a complaint is served to the defendant and the lawsuit has been pending, all of the lawsuit in this case shall be dismissed by judgment.