logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.08.17 2016노1127
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of suspended execution for a period of eight months, two years of community service order 120 hours, and forty hours of lecture for compliance driving) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case, while driving without a license, is deemed to have escaped without taking any measure while causing a traffic accident, and the nature of the crime is not good.

In 2015, there is a record of being punished by a fine due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On the other hand, the defendant agreed with the victims, and the degree of injury of the victims is relatively minor.

The defendant reflects his fault.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances following the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit, on the grounds that the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and it is not deemed unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow