Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the driver of the B-Saly Village bus.

On July 3, 2016, the Defendant driven the above bus at around 09:50, and made a left turn to the left at the right turn from the intersection to the left turn from the intersection of the transmission zone located in 157 at the center of the ducheon-si.

At all times, there are signal apparatuses installed in the front door, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty to take the care of the signal while driving the vehicle in good condition to prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and left left without stopping a yellow signal, and received the front part of the Ortobane without a license plate driven by the victim C (year 52) who was driving in the part facing the direction of the defendant's proceeding due to the negligence in the course of duties, and received the front part of the Or to the right side of the defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to die due to the above occupational negligence on the 15:38th day of the same day by causing the victim to suffer from the diversic brain injury caused by the diversic brain injury at the government-specific hospital of the Katol University, 271.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Punishment concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following conditions shall be considered in light of the favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The range of recommendations on the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommendations] shall be the range of general traffic accidents (the scope of recommendations] and the area (four to one year) reduced (the resulting in death of traffic accidents) (the area of special mitigation] to be mitigated;

2. Although there was a significant result from the negligence of the defendant's decision of sentencing leading to the death of the victim, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected in depth, and that the defendant agreed with the bereaved family of the victim.